What Strange Traits Are Humans Evolving Right Now?

What Strange Traits Are Humans Evolving Right Now?

Human evolution did not stop a long time ago; it is happening right now, often in ways that are not noticed because they occur across many generations. The driving force is natural selection, which works through inherited variants that become more common when their carriers leave more surviving children. Over thousands of years, these small changes allowed some groups of humans to drink milk as adults, others to live in high-altitude environments that would make most people dangerously ill, and some to hold their breath long enough to impress a swimming instructor. The ability to digest milk in adulthood is a striking example of recent human evolution.

Thumbnail

All human babies produce lactase, the enzyme needed to break down lactose, but in most mammals—and most of human history—this production drops off after weaning. When some human groups began herding cattle, sheep, goats, and camels, milk became a valuable source of water, calories, and protein. Mutations near the lactase gene that kept it active into adulthood arose independently in several populations, and they spread because those who carried them had a survival and reproductive advantage. Lactase persistence is a trait that is both recent and powerful, but it is not universal.

In evolutionary terms, the person who drinks a latte without any discomfort is the unusual one. The spread of this trait shows how a cultural practice—like dairying—can create the selection pressure that makes a new genetic trait common. Archaeological evidence shows that dairying existed long before lactase persistence became widespread, meaning some early herders absorbed the calcium from milk but likely experienced digestive discomfort from the lactose. At high altitudes, where each breath contains less oxygen, natural selection has produced equally fascinating adaptations.

The body can increase its red blood cell count to carry more oxygen, but pushing this response too far thickens the blood. The Tibetan solution involved genetic variants in the EPAS1 gene, which is involved in the body’s response to low oxygen. A portion of this Tibetan genetic variant came from Denisovans, an extinct group of archaic humans. Although most Denisovan DNA was diluted out of modern human populations, this particular stretch survived because it provided a crucial advantage at high altitude.

Instead of producing more red blood cells and causing dangerous blood viscosity, Tibetans appear to use oxygen more efficiently. The same problem has produced different answers in different high-altitude populations. The Andean highlanders of South America have their own set of genetic changes, and their physiology does not copy the Tibetan solution. This challenges the idea that the environment asks a question with only one correct response.

Evolution eliminates bad responses, but it can leave several workable ones in different populations. Malaria has also been a powerful driver of human evolution, and the changes it created can have painful costs. The disease infects red blood cells, so natural selection repeatedly altered the cells, their surface proteins, or the hemoglobin inside them to resist infection. The most famous example is the sickle cell variant.

A person who inherits one copy gains substantial protection against severe malaria, but a person who inherits two copies can develop sickle cell disease, where red cells become distorted, blood vessels block, and organs are damaged. Natural selection did not repair this contradiction; it accepted a severe genetic disease as the price of population-level malaria resistance. A similar trade-off appears elsewhere. The Duffy null form, which became extremely common in sub-Saharan Africa, offers strong protection against vivax malaria, but evidence shows that some infections can still occur through alternative routes that researchers do not yet fully understand.

The APOL1 gene variants that help protect against a lethal parasitic infection also increase susceptibility to several forms of kidney disease when a person carries two high-risk copies. The trait is not simply good or bad. In a modern medical environment, where the parasite may be treated, the kidney cost remains even after the original benefit is gone. The genome remembers threats that public health has already started to forget.

Natural selection does not only respond to infectious disease. The immune system evolved during a period when failing to attack a pathogen could mean death, but modern environments have changed that equation. New selective pressures arise constantly, and they are not always physical. Migration moves genetic variants into new environments.

Technology buffers the body from environmental stress, which some argue could weaken selection, but it does not end evolution. Instead, it rewrites the selective pressures. A clear example is the evolution of the spleen in some human populations. The Bajau people, who are known for their ability to stay underwater for long periods, have larger spleens than their neighboring groups who do not dive.

The spleen stores oxygenated red blood cells and releases them into circulation when the diving reflex kicks in. This larger spleen appears to be an inherited trait that has become more common because it lets a person stay underwater longer. Here, a cultural way of life has become a biological pressure. The same adaptive pattern is visible in high-altitude populations, where genetic variants affect oxygen transport, and in populations with a long history of eating starchy foods, where additional copies of the salivary amylase gene make starch digestion more efficient.

Some of the most interesting evidence for ongoing human evolution comes from studies of reproduction. In a historical French-Canadian island population, researchers found genetic changes associated with an earlier age at first reproduction over about 140 years. But these traits are difficult to study because the connection between a gene and a person’s number of children is rarely direct. A genetic variant associated with education may affect fertility indirectly through income, family planning, and social expectations.

A statistical association between a polygenic score and the number of children does not mean evolution has a simple preference for intelligence or height. Evolution has the planning horizon of a distracted teenager. It does not plan. It simply favors whatever slightly increases the chance of surviving to reproduce.

As a result, human evolution is not a single road heading toward one final human. It is a story of populations, environments, and technology pushing in many directions at once. The human body develops in response to its environment, and genes are only part of the equation. The strongest pressure on human evolution may not even be visible yet.

It will be the result of whatever new environmental and cultural conditions modern humans create for themselves, and how our genes respond to pressures we have not yet identified.